In many cases, discrepancies can already be resolved through a clarifying conversation, for example if certain value-relevant facts were not known to us.
If there are fundamental professional doubts, a second, independent valuer can be commissioned to review or recreate the appraisal report.
In court proceedings, if there are significant discrepancies between two appraisal reports, the court can additionally order a neutral superior expert opinion to conclusively resolve the disputed issue.
It is important to raise concrete professional objections rather than mere gut feeling – for example, based on differing, genuinely comparable sales cases in the immediate vicinity.
A well-founded, objective counter-proposal makes it considerably easier for us, as the original valuer, to comprehensibly review or adjust our assessment.
Please note: the content of this article is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax, financial or investment advice. It is not a substitute for individual advice from a licensed lawyer, tax adviser or financial adviser. Despite careful research, we accept no liability for the accuracy, completeness or currency of the information provided. For specific legal or tax questions, please consult a qualified professional adviser.